case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-21 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2270 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2270 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #324.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-21 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't come across as as funny as it used to be, or a smart as it used to be because every fucker else has copied it endlessly. It is like Star Trek, it is so cliched because it was the thing that got copied. You are getting the same effect you used to from it because it is no longer the single solitary beacon that it once was.

It happens to all trailblazers.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-22 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah no. I don't read much contemporary fiction, and definitely not enough to burn out/read too many like this one.

It bored me occasionally when I read it first. Good books may bore. Great books? Nope.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-22 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I would argue that great books can absolutely bore. I think anyone who's read Proust can attest to that. I mean, I really like Proust, but good Lord it can be a slog getting through it sometimes.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-23 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I would argue otherwise. You can have great ideas and be a shitty writer. That menas you produce shitty books that contain though-provoking ideas. Not great books.

Great writing is great. Its writer understands how to capture the human attention span and play it.