fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2270 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2270 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #324.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

but I seem to recall a hullabaloo about them refusing to let homeless lgbt people stay in their shelters unless they agreed to renounce homosexuality and seek treatment for it? Again, this is a vague recollection that could be off base or conflated with someone else.

For me personally I'm a little uncomfortable donating to them while they have a public anti-lgbt equality stance because their charitable activities serve a double purpose of gaining them positive publicity and potentially new followers. But then I do have a great local alternative to donate to and perhaps not everyone has that and the SA is the best they can do to help their community.

AYRT
I've heard people say that they've denied LGBQT people from staying in their shelters but no one has ever been able to back the claim up. I saw just the opposite many years ago when they opened temporary shelters to people who lost their homes to a hurricane when the Red Cross and National Guard were overwhelmed and couldn't provide shelter to everyone. I remember being told to avoid getting placed with them because they mandated bible study for anyone they helped but we didn't have a choice. I spent almost two weeks in one of their tents and it was identical in appearance and operations to the RC and NG tents.

There's this story about a man who claims that he and his boyfriend were refused help unless they agreed to break up and attend church. I'm not sure if that's a story you've already encountered (and feel isn't backed up enough) or not, and I don't know enough to say if it is accurate. But if you hadn't seen a specific account, well, there you go.

Thanks for sharing this because I hadn't seen it before.

I wonder how much of what happened had to do with the time, the locality, the personal beliefs of the person they talked to, and how much had to do with the organization as a whole. There's probably no way to know for certain, which is a shame. Is this an isolated incident or organization-wide practice? If they really are discriminating against LGBTQ people, I think the world should know the details so we can change it or have the organization's favorable status changed/revoked in the countries where they operate.

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of it is dependent largely on factors you bring up, like the locality and the individuals. I'm sure not everyone with the Salvation Army would do this to people. But even if it happens at all, I think it's still a problem with the Salvation Army as a whole. They're responsible for setting standards, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are some people in the organization who believe that the Salvation Army's values justify prejudice against LGBT people. If that isn't what the organization as a whole supports, I think they need to work harder to set the record straight--both with the public and within their own organization.

It's also a problem, I think, with religious-based charities becoming the main source of help for people. Many religious charities are wonderful, and I think they're a valuable resource. But there's always a risk of people being denied help, or being forced to do things that conflict with their own beliefs and values in order to get it.

[ SECRET POST #2270 ]

I know nothing about this

Re: I know nothing about this

Re: I know nothing about this

Re: I know nothing about this

Re: I know nothing about this