[ SECRET POST #2272 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2272 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 140 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Appropriation

[chardmonster]

I'd be with you on this if the OP post hadn't been phrased like a blatant troll.

I might be getting anons confused, though.

Re: Appropriation

[(Anonymous)]

No, I was the Fighting Irish OP post. Every anon after that was someone else.

And I wasn't going for trolling or think that the Fighting Irish have it bad, by the way. I just wanted to see how the original OP would separate the two.

Re: Appropriation

[charming_stranger]

Yeah, the principle probably can't be applied to the OP, or they need to work on not coming across as ignorant or trolls.

Re: Appropriation

[(Anonymous)]

I'm confused now because yeahscience said I wasn't precisely wrong, and I dont know why im considered troll-like. I'm not American, maybe I'm missing something

Re: Appropriation

[charming_stranger]

If you're the op, then you basically just said "appropriation doesn't exist, so shut up." No qualifiers, no explanations, just that. I don't really see how that can be anything but a) an attempt to tear people down or b) looking for a fight.

Re: Appropriation

[(Anonymous)]

This is the thread where I asked if the history of rock music would be considered an example of appropriation. I've always thought it existed?? I dont know how you (and possibly chard??) thought otherwise. Anon stops being useful as a way to put forth ideas free from preconceptions if people keep on trying to build narratives and personalities around them... not that I blame you, since ive done the same thing... confusion :(

Re: Appropriation

[charming_stranger]

But in that case, you're not the OP. The top post for this whole discussion is the one whose topic says "Appropriation." This one:
http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/777924.html?thread=640305092#cmt640305092

If several anonymous posters are involved in the same discussion, things can get confusing. Starting your post with "Anon you replied to" (AYRT), "Same anon" (SA), "Not the anon you replied to" (NAYRT) or "Different anon" DA can help a lot.

But when someone talks about "OP", they generally means the person who made the very first post and started the whole discussion.