case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-24 03:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2273 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: Fellow Libruls

[personal profile] tabaqui 2013-03-24 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Leeetle bit different, since a fetus at 12 weeks (or whenever) is *nothing* like a living, thinking, breathing human. Now, ask if i should be allowed to smother my newborn, and we'll discuss.

But a clump of cells? A fetus that has no actual brain, just a nervous system? Not a person.

ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Fellow Libruls

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-03-24 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Certainly agree, it's the perfect response with no worthwhile counter.

But that's not an argument from bodily autonomy?
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: Fellow Libruls

[personal profile] tabaqui 2013-03-24 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry, I'm not understanding your question here.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: Fellow Libruls

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-03-24 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
"The pianist? I have no idea what that is. But, yes - bodily autonomy, it's an actual thing."

I took that to be you agreeing with the person the anon was sarcastically quoting that bodily autonomy was sacrosanct, and pointed out why people might run into ethical issues with that particular argument?