[ SECRET POST #2273 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I've seen people being so into drawn porn (of humans/anthros/whatever) they find thinking about real people in a sexual way revolting. Are they asexual???

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I think the real question is if that matters.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

No, they're just sexually attracted to people who don't exist and have extremely unrealistic standards of attractiveness.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I'd still like a clear and definite definition of asexual. I'm trying to hard to understand it. >_

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

There really isn't a clear cut definition, but might I ask what you're having trouble with?

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

What is a clear and definite definition of a homosexual? A person sexually attracted to their own sex.

A clear and definite definition of a heterosexual? A person sexually attracted to the opposite sex.

So then, a clear and definite definition of an asexual person is...?

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

The closest you're going to get is 'Someone who does not experience sexual attraction'.

Note: That has nothing to do with actual having sex, or enjoying the act of sex - just not looking at someone and having a 'Damn, they fine!' reaction.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

But that's a terrible marker too. I never see a randomer and think "damn, they're fine". Not even celebrities. But I'm not asexual at all. I just don't react to people that way.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

I think that's considered a fetish at that point (in the clinical/psychological sense - that is, something that must be there for one to be aroused).

Asexuals generally wouldn't be aroused by anything (barring non-specific arousal from hormonal fluctuations or whatever).

Not that it really matters to you if you fall into neither of these groups.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

...and now I can't be asexual anymore. Okay.

I keep getting conflicting answers on whether fetishists can be asexual. Particularly fetishists for whom the thing that arouses them has nothing to do with sex.

Re: Are furries/otaku etc, asexual?

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I have no clue. I'm not an expert in sexual psychology, and even if I was, I probably still wouldn't have an answer for you.

Personally, I take an "If the shoe fits..." approach to all this - if you've got a clear enough definition of your own sexuality and "asexual" feels like the best-fitting label, then go with it. It's not like it hurts anybody.