[ SECRET POST #2273 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fellow Libruls

[(Anonymous)]

If valuing peoples ability to live life unencumbered as long as it doesn't leave the weak at the mercy of the strong or send the country down the crapper isn't an enforcement of morality, what is it?

All legislation is based in moral belief yo, even if it is a utilitarian calculus.

Re: Fellow Libruls

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

Yeah, of course there's some moral belief involved, but the fact that it's based on some moral belief doesn't magically make it okay to impose moral belief onto everything. There are common sense lines to be drawn.

Now, common sense is pretty debated, but that doesn't make it any less valid. Just because not everyone knows or agrees with what the common-sense decision is, doesn't mean it doesn't exist or that people can't eventually find it. We've done it before: we've decided it was common sense to let women vote, outlaw slavery, etc. Those things used to be debatable, but they're not debatable anymore because we know more and understand things better now than we did a hundred or two hundred years ago.

There's nothing wrong with an erroneous moral belief -- how are you supposed to find out it's wrong without testing it? But the best way to do the least damage with these erroneous moral beliefs before you realize "oh, that's actually rubbish" is to not be too overzealous in imposing them all over people who disagree with you unless you're faced with obvious or short-term consequences, in which case imposing moral beliefs that may be wrong because they have non-obvious or long-term consequences but which solve obvious short-term is pretty much just the best available course of action.