[ SECRET POST #248 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #248 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12. [ repeat ]

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 143 secrets from Secret Submission Post #036.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 3 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 2 3 ] personal attacks, [ 1 ] attempt at parody, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, September 11th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Shakespeare isn't actually copyrighted – when something is as old as the works of Shakespeare it ceases to be protected by copyright law. The same goes for other popularly illustrated things like Alice in Wonderland or fairy tales.

And I think you're missing the point I'm making here: artists don't need to be so possessive about their work. It doesn't honestly matter if someone posts it somewhere without crediting the artist. Sure, it's rude to do it if the artist has said they'd like credit, but I think most artists are being kind of up themselves in demanding it.

[kurenai-tenka.livejournal.com]

Well, what of the official arts for say...Harry Potter? The people who commissioned them are the ones with the main rights, but they can say where and where not they're to be posted.


Maybe they don't need to be. I'm not disputing it. All's I'm saying is whether they're in the right or not it should be there choice.