Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2013-04-03 06:41 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2013-04-03 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2283 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2283 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
__________________________________________________
16.
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
But I do think you get it in movies and TV shows too. Where they try to add a layer of complexity by offering a point of sympathy with the villain, but then end up destabilizing their protaganists' moral compass by letting the original designated antagonist have too much of their own say. Fine in a story that was always intended to take the antagonist's side. But more irritating where it ends up throwing everything into a distracting moral relativism.