Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-04 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2284 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2284 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random porn ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
Mind you, I'm not saying it's okay to hate people or commit crimes against them based on whatever subculture they are a part of, just that it shouldn't be considered a hate crime
Re: Mancester Police now consider attacks on Goths etc Hate Crimes
(Anonymous) 2013-04-05 04:32 am (UTC)(link)I don't like the emphasis on "you CHOOSE to be goth, etc." for a couple of reasons. First, it sounds kind of really victim-blamey, like if they didn't want to be targeted for this kind of violence, they should just give up this subculture/presentation that they've made a significant part of their identity (and yes, there are lifelong goths and whatnot). Second, I reject the notion that I'm ALWAYS going to be Catholic despite having walked away from the religion. Besides which, it implies that converts cannot be the target of violence on the basis of their adopted religion, even if they are dressed in a way that clearly identifies them as a member of that faith (for instance, Muslim converts wearing hijab).
For me, the defining factors of a hate crime are (1) that it targets people based on membership in a group that forms a significant component of their identity, whether innate or chosen, and (2) that it targets them specifically and solely because of that identity characteristic, in a way that implicitly threatens and intimidates all members of that group. It's that implicit threat that makes it a hate crime, and as long as the group you're threatening has a single, unifying identity, I don't see how it becomes a "lesser" form of terrorism if the identity is a chosen one.