case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-05 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2285 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2285 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[NCIS]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[Kirk Cameron]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Lindsay Lohan, Sean Penn, Sean Bean]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[MCU/Marvel movies - NOT the comics]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________













[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













10. [SPOILERS for Spartacus War of the Damned]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Dangan Ronpa]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for The Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for House MD]



__________________________________________________















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














14. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for abuse]

[the beatles]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
That article is terrible -- and it's not because of Lohan. Frankly, Lohan seems to be the LEAST horrible, mean-spirited, immature person in the article, and I'm including the writer/reporter in that. Lindsay was late and sometimes a little immature and flaky, but the director and apparently everyone else involved, including the guy writing the article, behaved completely reprehensibly. How gross.

Let's put it this way, after reading that, I'm not holding anything against Lindsay Lohan. Schrader, on the other hand...

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
DA. Wow, I don't know why (because there's a million people with a million different opinions on the Internet), but your take on that article really surprises me. I think it's very generous to summarize Lindsay's behavior as just a "little immature and flaky" - but then, I've been reading the celebrity columns for a few years, so maybe I'm biased by the numerous accounts of her constant thefts, substance abuse, and inability to get the job done.
itstopped: (Default)

[personal profile] itstopped 2013-04-06 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Immature and flaky? Seriously? She repeatedly failed to do her job, cost the production money, wasted everyone's time including the people who were most likely there for pennies, went out partying when she was supposed to be working and even left the production driving drunk.

Paul Schrader and James Deen are both fairly douchey, but I can't fathom how they come off as reprehensible while she comes off as "a little flaky." I used to work in film and she would have been a nightmare to me.