case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-06 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2286 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2286 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
da

But, there is a difference between "real men" and trans men. I don't pretend at all to be a real man. I'd love to be, I'd kill to be, but I know I was born female, so I'm different. It may not be polite, in the way that telling someone they're fat, or they got a bad haircut, is frowned upon, but it is true.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
There is a difference, but when you start to declare what is "real" and what is not, that's the problem. There shouldn't be a hierarchy or dismissive labeling. Find another way to phrase it.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Different you may be, but all men are different. When you say "real" it automatically draws a parallel with "fake." Are you? If you are, does that mean all trans men are?

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
oh this real bullshit again

real women have curves real women are skinny real women are strong real women are weak real women dont need a man real women make good wives whatever the fuck

"real anything" is such bullshit

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 02:22 pm (UTC)(link)
But real men do have penises. That's a biological fact. You can't ignore it.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing is, by using "real men" to differentiate someone who was born biologically male and someone whose trans, *does* actually mean you're saying that their identity as a male is invalid. It isn't 'real', which isn't true.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

I get what you're saying. It is confusing either way... would "real male" be any better, or the same? Or "traditional male"? I just feel there needs to be some distinction between "man in body" and "man in spirit"... personally, myself, for my own peace of mind. I'm not suggesting that anything I propose needs to be the rule for everyone.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Honestly, I'd just use biological male, since what you're referring to is someone who was born biologically male, and the terms already in use so there'd be less confusion attached to it. But it's really up to you.
caecilia: (heart shades)

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

[personal profile] caecilia 2013-04-07 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
"cis"

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
The average person offline, and possibly online, is not familiar with that term.
caecilia: (Default)

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

[personal profile] caecilia 2013-04-07 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
they can open a dictionary

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
Shocking as it may be, dictionaries do not generally contain definitions of prefixes. They contain definitions of actual words.

Instead of being a total jackass about it, when someone asks you what a word means online or in real life, you could, quite possibly, tell them what it means instead of telling them to open a dictionary, or (jesus christ) directing them to the pinnacle of douchebaggery that is LMGTFY.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)
uh, I dunno what kinda shitty dictionaries you use, but all the ones I've ever looked in do define things like prefixes and suffixes.

now, an actual objection would be that many dictionaries probably don't have this definition of cis in them yet.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cis

cis
adjective \ˈsis\
Definition of CIS
: characterized by having certain atoms or groups of atoms on the same side of the longitudinal axis of a double bond or of the plane of a ring in a molecule

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-09 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
win

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
da

I couldn't disagree more. I am a real man. My body is a male body. Yeah, it's got some differences from most other mens' bodies, but that doesn't make it not male, or me not a "real man".

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
You fuckers confuse the issue so much.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this

(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks for letting me know I'm not allowed to have a say in how I label my own body. Asshole.