Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-06 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2286 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2286 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this
(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this
(Anonymous) 2013-04-06 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)Personally, it is not a distinction I make (as in, to me bi = pan = bi) but if other people want to make it, it is not a distinction I particularly consider harmful to protest it (unlike, say, demisexuality). I know for me I would not be put off if my partner's sex did not match their gender, but at the same time, I have known other bisexuals who are not attracted by it.
Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this
(Anonymous) 2013-04-07 12:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: I might be too old-fashioned for all this