case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-11 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2291 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2291 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly as much as you'd belittle anyone else expressing supernatural beliefs on this comm.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-11 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
There is a great big deal of difference between someone going to church on sunday and someone deciding they are a werewolf.

You'd have to be like sixteen and sullen not to see the contextual difference. Or a Redditor.

Now if he's going to the Church of Wolfbutts I could see a comparison.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
There's more to religion than "going to church on Sunday." Religions involve beliefs, and some of those beliefs are pretty damn wacky. Have you read much about Mormonism, for instance?
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-11 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes! And I think there's a huge difference between believing in really dodgy theories about the settlement of North America and deciding that you are a wolf, for several reasons.

1. Religious people tend to be raised with this belief; it is an important part of their culture. Otherkin haven't been around very long and seem to decide they are _____ animal based on websites.

2. Religious people tend to believe they are human.

3. Most devout people don't claim to personally experience visions. They may attribute certain actions to divine providence, but they do not claim to see sparkly lights or hear booming voices. The OP claims to experience Wolfiness at the full moon.

If you think most religious people are like devout Mormons then I'm afraid you don't know much about religion. Your average mainline Christian is going to have different experiences than someone devout. Your average Mormon will have different experiences than a particularly devout Mormon.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
1. What about converts? People who weren't raised to believe that they will become gods in the afterlife and populate an entire planet of their own with their spirit-progeny, but adopt the belief in adulthood?

2. Many religious people also believe that a piece of them is immortal. How is that more implausible thank believing that a piece of them is non-human?

3. I've encountered people who claim to have personally experienced God, heard his voice, or had some other "miracle" happen to them. Then there are the ones who say they have a "relationship with Jesus."

I'm well aware that the average believer and the devout believer look very different; does that mean that you mock devout believers the way you mock the OP?
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-11 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry, but you do not have nearly enough edge to cut through centuries of cultural context. Despite your dogged attempts to turn a hilarious werewolf secret into religion wank you do not have a leg--real or otherlimb--to stand on.

Each and every one of the people you've mentioned does not believe they are a wolf.
Edited 2013-04-11 23:59 (UTC)
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-04-12 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
And thus they are supeirior. Only humans have rights.

The day furries exist is a day of human unification. People will all come together in a glorious genocide of the genefilth that would ursurp us and cast the world into yiffyness.

On that day, black and white, jew and christian and muslim and buddhist, liberal and conservative, all will join together hand in hand around the burning pile as we send the damned screaming to hell.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
A+ trolling. Would LOL again.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Why is believing you are a wolf so much more absurd than believing you will become the god of your own planet when you're dead? You're trying to paint one of these things as normal and the other as beyond-the-pale bizarre, but not giving any reason for the distinction.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-12 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Why are you still trying to press this?

Religion/spirituality is a rather old thing. It appears to be more or less a constant in human history.

"I am a wolf, no, for real, follow my tumblr for insight into my lupine soul" is a relatively recent development largely dependent on the internet as a means of connecting disparate people who believe they are actually animals or elves or dragons. It also doesn't seem to have a spiritual component for most of those who feel that way.

If you cannot see a difference between these things then you have very little depth.
Edited 2013-04-12 00:29 (UTC)

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Shit, that went through un-anon. What are my chances of you respecting my desire not to be excoriated by the Troll Posse and laughed out of the comm? I'm not the OP of the secret, btw.

"Why are you still trying to press this?"

...Because we were having a conversation, and you made a statement that I felt needed clarification? Is that not how this discussion thing works?

I don't see why "it's old" makes one idea acceptable and the other laughable, if they're both unsubstantiated and silly when taken on their merits.

I also don't know what you mean when you say it doesn't have a spiritual component. Any "soul," whether "lupine" or otherwise, is a spiritual concept.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-12 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
(I don't want to laugh anyone out of the comm!)

I guess my feelings are that I'm trying to steer clear of wank and people are so willing to start it; starting religious wank in an otherkin thread is kind of stretching it in a way the CS Lewis stuff yesterday was not. I don't see religion and otherkin as really comparable in anything but a vague sense. One is an important cultural touchstone, the other one is a fad on the internet.

Belief in a "soul" is spiritual. I was talking more an organized, coherent metaphysics sense. I probably shouldn't have used that word.

Frankly I think you were trying to back me into insulting religious people by comparing them to otherkin because you think it makes a point. I don't like that.
Edited 2013-04-12 01:38 (UTC)

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, I'm not trying to "back you into" anything, or force you to insult anyone -- if anything, kind of the opposite. I don't understand why mean-spirited mockery of one group of people with unfounded beliefs is okay when others with beliefs that are just as unfounded get a pass, and it makes me uncomfortable to see anyone subjected to that kind of derision when they're not actually hurting anyone. We may find the beliefs of otherkin silly, but I don't understand the hate -- especially from people who will staunchly defend other people's beliefs in things that seem just as odd when examined on their merits.

I guess, here's my issue: I can understand wanting to respect a belief that holds major emotional significance for a person or group of people. And I can understand wanting to point and laugh at beliefs that are silly and unrealistic. But I can't understand treating one set of beliefs one way and another set of beliefs the other way, with what strike me as fairly arbitrary distinctions between the two. At least, distinctions that have nothing to do with the merits of the beliefs themselves.
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2013-04-12 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It's telling that the original secret didn't mention religion but compared themselves to POC experiencing racism, and yet there are more comments saying 'lol, religious people though' than pointing out that this is a completly false comparison.

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] sugar_spun 2013-04-12 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Well, here's the thing: basically every single human society in the history of forever has believed in gods or supernatural spirits that control the universe. This is normal to human existence itself. Faith is as normal as love is.

Now, when you talk about otherkin, you're talking about something new entirely. Religious people--for the most part--talk about things they do not experience and do not feel and simply assume. They don't say "I think I'm part god"--anyone who says that would receive the same amount of ridicule, even though gods are a normal part of human society. In fact, they often do. I'm sure you've heard of ill people who believe they are Jesus.

Otherkin is simply more ridiculous than religion. It doesn't mean otherkin is actually less true than some other religion (or less fake, if that works better). It just means it's sillier.

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2013-04-12 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
"They don't say "I think I'm part god"--anyone who says that would receive the same amount of ridicule, even though gods are a normal part of human society. "

Well, unless you happen to be pantheist, panentheist, subscribe to certain mystical views about the Holy Spirit, pagan, or some flavors of Hinduism and Buddhism. But then, "I'm part god" isn't anything special, because so, potentially, is everything else in the world.

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] sugar_spun 2013-04-12 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, they would still ridicule you for thinking you're Krishna incarnate or the Buddha came back again or if you are actually the one, true deity or something.

Because there's actually a huge difference between 'we are spiritually linked' and 'I'm part god'.

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos - 2013-04-12 03:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] sugar_spun - 2013-04-12 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
There are more than a few fundamental issues with this. First, pretty much since science became a thing, there have been more than a few people who didn't believe in gods or supernatural spirits that control the universe. So no, it's not universal. It's not any more normal to human existence than believing in unicorns.

I'll give you that faith is normal, but the thing is, this person has faith too, just because it's different from what you've been conditioned to accept as normal doesn't actually mean that it's not.

The belief that some humans contain within themselves the spirit of animals is ancient. The term otherkin isn't, and I'm sure that there are a fair number of kids who just want to be special little snowflakes on the internet making this their niche. But, the idea, the core concept is very old and has been a part of many religions. I fail to see how it's any less valid than any other religious belief, and all I've seen in these threads so far, is that other religious beliefs are old and this one's shiny and new. Well, it's not, so what's your excuse to single this group of people out and ridicule them now.

I see in later comments that you clarify the "I'm part God," comment, but I almost find that more baffling. How is my belief (and this is my belief) that each of us holds a piece of the divine within ourselves any less weird than someone's belief that they hold an animal spirit within themselves.

All that said, I think that there are issues with the secret. I think that the myth and legend of werewolves is a very different thing from the belief that you carry an animal spirit or soul. Which means that pretending that Teen Wolf or something is a gross perpetuation of stereotypes against someone who does believe that, similar to the treatment of women or POCs in media can be, is ridiculous to say the least. I think I need to sleep now; I'm afraid that last sentence didn't actually make sense.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
+1

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
"Most devout people don't claim to personally experience visions. They may attribute certain actions to divine providence, but they do not claim to see sparkly lights or hear booming voices"

Many sections of the Christian faith actually do believe that. "Miracles" like the Virgin Mary bleeding, talking in tongues, getting "touched by God" - all true to many, many Christians.
Stop saying "most" like you actually have a clue. It's really obnoxious how you claim to be right about shit you have just researched for five minutes on wikipedia.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: Are you real

[personal profile] chardmonster 2013-04-12 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
I'm ABD in american history. A lot of that had to do with religion, because you have to understand american culture to teach.

But yeah whatever wikipedia. Believing in miracles is not the same as actually thinking you are a wolf in human form.

Go back to Reddit Atheism. Tell them how you just won an argument or something.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
dude people laugh their ASSES off at Mormons.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
...so you're saying we should go to town.

If you want a sensitive lovefest about how misunderstood you are, I think you're looking in all the wrong places.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
If that were actually how this comm treated religion, then yes, by all means. But you clearly haven't been around the past couple of days.

Re: Are you real

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
They should try Fanficrants. No matter how batshit crazy you are they will always be willing to put on their SJW hats on your behalf.