case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-11 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2291 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2291 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
DA. I don't think this is an either/or proposition. I would like to see more protagonists, and just more characters in general, who aren't all straight, male, white, middle to upper class, AND young AND able bodied, etc. That doesn't mean they have to tick all of those boxes. Just ticking one or two more often would be nice, I think. And it also shouldn't be a one "token" person per show limit, as it often is now.

Also, one thing that sometimes creeps me out about fandom is its occasional (not always) marginalization of canonically gay characters in favor of heterosexual characters in "if it's you, it's okay" exception same sex relationships. It bugs me for the same reason the obnoxious "no homo" tagline does, even if it makes some sense in context.
altumcor: (Default)

[personal profile] altumcor 2013-04-12 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
It sort of felt like it did when I read it initially, but if my comment reads a bit too strong, I apologise.

But yes, yes, and yes. This is another issue I tackle with because usually, even with all the gay fiction I've read, the protagonists are almost always white Adonises with equally "conventionally attractive" white men who half the time are straight until the protagonist comes along. Then again, this is almost always a sign of an amateur in regards to the last part, but still.

And the whole "if it's you, it's okay", drives me nuts since it comes off that being heterosexual is part of why the other male character is attracted to him. And it sort of drives home why I'm come to hate this certain phrase which has been thrown around the gay community a lot: "straight-acting". As if, for one, heterosexuality makes a man, and two, that masculinity conventionally associated with heterosexual men is the epitome of attraction. Blah.