[ SECRET POST #2296 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2296 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fuchsiascreams]

I don't understand all of the conclusions people are drawing up and down this thread. The fact that it happened does not mean that she's making a fucking implication, holy shit. Like the person upthread who said that J. K. Rowling was "implying" that children who come from loveless relationships (Voldemort, who was conceived because his unmarried mother used a Love Potion on his father) turned out badly. What? HER WRITING IT INTO THE BOOKS DOES NOT MEAN THAT SHE IS DRAWING AN IMPLICATION. Correlation =/= causation.

[(Anonymous)]

Don't fucking throw around science terms incorrectly like that. It's not even remotely relevant to what your saying. Passages in her book either imply certain things or they don't. That's not correlation or causation.

You clearly don't understand what an implication is. Almost everything people say, do or write has implications. The most of the exceptions being when people are being *explicit* instead.

Also, JKR *explicitly* stated in an interview that Voldemort couldn't love because he was conceived while his father was under a love potion. Now, if you're a believe in Death to the Author you can ignore that as "not canon", but that doesn't mean people are wrong to question *why* she decided that and shared it in an interview.