Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-17 06:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2297 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2297 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-17 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)I can't think of any sexist moments either, really. Jules and the Chief are every bit as capable as the men are and neither of them are overly sexualized. There could be something inherently sexist in that the cast has more main male characters (four) than female (two, and really the Chief almost shouldn't count as a "main" character) but I've been really enjoying that they've let Jules relax and shine a bit more, giving her some goofy moments similar to what the guys get. It helps make her a stronger character, to not have her as the lone major character acting as straightman.
OT
(Anonymous) 2013-04-18 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OT