case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-17 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2297 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2297 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-17 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I would it it poses a risk of rendering the label moot. A word doesn't lose meaning just because some people misuse it sometimes. If most people misuse it most of the time, then it's not very useful or it starts to mean something else, but some people overapplying it doesn't make the concept worthless.

[personal profile] sugar_spun 2013-04-18 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Something being moot is not something being pointless. It means that it makes it up for debate. I don't know if the other anon meant it the right way, but still.