case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-18 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #2298 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2298 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-19 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
But can I say that Hannibal has depth while Loki is simply a whiny, boring, wretched psychopath?

Huh? Huh? Can I?

(anon because must of my friends are Loki-positive.)

(Anonymous) 2013-04-19 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
I'd say canon Loki has a fair bit of depth, between his loss of identity and jumping feet first into galactic conqueror. He's got some nice Shakespearean traits, if you're into that sort of thing. Fanon Loki, on the other hand ... not so much.

You can prefer one over the other personally, no problem. Morally speaking, it's a toss up on whether you think small-scale, personal crime is better or worse than grand scale, impersonal crime. (Is it more twisted to destroy an individual life for the sake of artistry, or callously wipe out thousands just because they happened to be in the way?)

Either way, though, neither of them are exactly people of the year.