fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2301 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2301 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Sorry for lateness, had internet issues.

FOR LIVESTREAMERS: Please post stream announcements under the events thread instead of in the General Comments. And here's your warning: huge images are going to just be deleted. ):

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #329.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

>Then there also was The Critique of Pure Reason, and it sure is good, >although I do not see it as the cleverest book on metaphysics ever.

A FELLOW PHILOSOPHY BUFF OH JESUS YES

I also have a great interest in philosophy... or, er, pretend to have: not sure if I have the right to call myself a philosophy fan while I hardly read anything (it's not about my lack of understanding, I just happen to suffer from anxiety-driven procrastination for a long time, so bringing myself to books is not as simple as I'd like it to be) but I've read Kant alright. I would say that despite being one of the most eloquent and clear-minded thinkers he might not be the most inspiring one. Speaking of which, I'm super excited to know what you consider to be a better (in terms of quality and/or appealing to you personally) book on metaphysics? Just for the sake of sharing, my current love is Kierkegaard.

Now I almost regret having preferred a good night sleep over hanging about on f!s.

Same here! I'm just getting into it. But I'm young, and everything is ahead of me, including some Greek philosophers and a couple of modern ones I'd particularly like to read.

So haven't tried Kierkegaard yet, but I think he's on my list now.

My favourites are Hume and Russell (although I do not share Russell's excitement in regard to mathematical philosophy); whilst Russell's History of Western Philosophy is not written in order to represent the author's stand on the matter, it certainly does contain opinions I agree with and is generally beautiful.

I must also confess that I like some of Dawkins' stuff, including The God Delusion. Doesn't mean that I agree with him on all accounts, but he's interesting, bright, and, I think, not nearly as diehard as people like to allege.

Are you still here? Because I've been busy and didn't have time to comment back.

Just wanted to say that Russell is great indeed, I'm looking forward to reading his 'History...' from cover to cover. From the passages I've read I've got the impression that this work combines simple language and good sense of humour with profound understanding of the subject and therefore is one of the best sources on Western philosophy (up to Russell, of course).

Ay, I still am :)

You may have some problems with his ideas, since you're a Christian, but I personally feel that his writing shouldn't rub religious people the wrong way. If he states harsh opinions, it is only when the philosopher in question expresses cruel and unreasonable attitudes towards people; Russell is simply very sympathetic, and some of the most odious Christian theories scare him (say, Saint Augustin's beliefs regarding sins). He also expresses admiration for the religious philosophers he thinks are good people/logicians, and I honestly can see very little anti-religious bias in his work (if only we don't count the fact that he aspires to be very logical and is slightly nonplussed by the concept of unreasonable belief).

And yes, his sense of humour is one of my favourite parts of the History. "Aristotle seems to be a combination of Plato and common sense. It is, of course, very difficult to imagine: these two things are hardly compatible".

[ SECRET POST #2301 ]

Re: Bookchat!

Re: Bookchat!

Re: Bookchat!

Re: Bookchat!