Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-04 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2314 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2314 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

A really dumb metaphor
(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)Neither is a good thing, but Moffat's sexism is like hot chocolate powder blended into milk to make a rich chocolatey sexist mixture that is inseparably intertwined from the plot and which you cannot avoid, whereas RTD, and most writers that fall into sexist pitfalls, are like milk with little chocolate chips in it that annoy you because it mars your enjoyment of the milk, but which you can avoid and theoretically pick out, leaving the rest of the milk intact. Which is a lot harder to do with mixed in hot chocolate powder.
Why am I comparing sexism to chocolate? My brain is stupid.
Re: A really dumb metaphor
(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 02:51 am (UTC)(link)