Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-05 03:31 pm
[ SECRET POST #2315 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2315 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
If people look for quality writing, then, IMO, the nature of the ending should be determined by the inner logic of the story and the idea the author wants to convey. There is, however, id fic - and this is something that can ignore inner logic for the sake of tropes.
Taking into account the fact that fandoms are full of id fic and other trope-concentrated stuff, I find it ridiculous that somebody objects to having stories end happily.
I'm not entirely with you on this one - I don't hate sad endings at all - but I do love both wish-fulfillment fanfiction and happy endings, and I do wish there was more of that.
[the reason for finding sad endings "inherently superior", though, probably lies in the fact that people consider sad stories "deeper" and "more serious" than the happy ones. But, first of all, one can have plenty of drama and still use a happy finale; and, second, sad endings are not something that is meaningful a priori. Sometimes they're just dumb.
One of my favourite literary examples of a happy ending is the finale of Catch-22 - and who would call this shallow and light-hearted?..]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
This! Happy endings are bad when they mangle the established principles of plot, character, and setting to achieve them. If you tell me in Act I that circumstances are bleak, in Act II that they're even worse, and in Act III that they're absolutely hopeless, you don't get to pull a magical rainbow-farting genie in the denouement out of a bottle to conclude with "happily ever after." If you say all along that a character is an asshole, you don't get to make him an angel in the last dozen pages without doing the work of setting up that character development. If you establish as a rule that something is a curse of doom, de doommity, doom DOOoooOOOooOOM, you don't get to make an exception on the last page.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-06 12:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 07:49 am (UTC)(link)