fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2315 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2315 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Oh, definitely. I completely believe that nostalgia plays a big role in the preference, and that by far people prefer FMA2003 because they saw it first. I just don't hold with the idea that FMA2003 is better because it's more depressing, and that the only reason folks like Brotherhood is because they can't handle the angsty depth. Arguments for thinking it the superior anime used to run the better characters/better plot gamut, and lately they've devolved into '2003 is better because Ed cries a lot, and Roy is a broken shell of a man and Brotherhood is cheesy fun-times Shonen schlock'. My point is, the original can be better for many reasons, but I can't stand the 'darker=deeper' argument.

[ SECRET POST #2315 ]

no subject