case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-05 03:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #2315 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2315 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-06 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
On the other hand, I know exactly what trend the OP is talking about -- the notion that "real literature" has depressing endings, and if a story ends "too happily" it's just trying to go for juvenile wish fulfillment rather than offering "a message." There are a disturbingly high number of people who think that sad ending = meaningful and happy ending = vapid. (There's a lot of overlap with the group that thinks "literary fiction" = worthwhile, intelligent reading and "genre fiction" = escapist drek.)