case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-07 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2317 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-05-07 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
ns is a broken link
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2013-05-07 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
General comments link just goes to page 2.

ns and gc links

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
ns link is missing initial http

gc link is to today's post not gc thread

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
hey case, thanks for fixing the ns and gc links

the ns link at the bottom of the first page (the one for the discussion thread) is still broken. same problem as above.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
15 should have a warning for shota

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
just came here to say the same thing

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
How many times does it have to be said that Case doesn't assign the warnings, and if the secret's OP didn't mention it, then tough luck?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
He's assigned warnings when it's mentioned to him even if the OP didn't when they submitted the secret.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
...no? The mention of a pairing existing doesn't require a warning, for fuck's sake. It's not like they're going into detail.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
It's a secret about two kids having a sexual relationship. A warning request hardly seems out of order.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
It's the tamest fucking secret I've ever seen on FS. I think your delicate sensibilities will make it through.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry for not being a paedophile.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Nice try, but no. Go try to start warning wank on a kink meme somewhere; case doesn't play that game.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I just asked for a warning in the appropriate place for that. If case doesn't want to warn for it, then fine. No harm in asking. I'm sorry if it offended you that someone asked for a warning about something that's illegal in every single country in the world.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
AFAIK there's no written law in my country against two fictional characters of similar fictional age having a consensual fictional relationship. Where do you live where fiction is governed in this manner?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
pedobearapproves.gif

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Oh fuck off. They're fictional. As in not real. That's not pedophilia and it doesn't need a warning, you asshat.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
And now you know not to ask for warnings.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Go fuck yourself. If you honestly think real underage kids don't have romantic and yes, sexual relationships, you're a moron.

If you think the depiction of such relationships is automatically smut, you're disgusting.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
If it is a secret about two kids having a relationship (I have no idea what fandom this is), how would that make you a pedophile?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
It's a secret about two kids having sex. Smutfic about kids is for paedophiles.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Oh you're one of those. Now I understand. Kindly fuck off stage left. The bear will be along shortly.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2013-05-08 14:04 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
...wow. One of the oldest anime slash pairings suddenly needs pedo warnings? Wow. Aren't they, like, 15 or something?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Aren't they like 15 years old? Pretty sure shota refers to prepubescent kids, not teenagers. Not that it still can't be uncomfortable to read as an adult, but still, hugely different territory than little kids.

haha reminds me of how when I was 15, I read/wrote a lot of Trowa/Quatre fic from Gundam Wing. Now that I'm... very much not 15, it is a bit weird for me, but still I support the pairing in a you-can-hold-hands type of way.