[ SECRET POST #2317 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Major spoilers for "The Angels Take Manhattan"

[replicantangel]

If it had been something he didn't like though, he wouldn't be able to change it, so it wouldn't have necessarily helped at all. All it would have done was give him a script that he *must* abide by, at risk of destroying the universe if he tried deviating from it.

I think the scene was meant to show that the things read could not be changed or undone. Unfortunately, shoddy writing throughout the episode (like with Rory dying alone but not really in the end) undermined it. And that doesn't change the fact that the Doctor *was* a major dick about the whole thing.

Anyway, just trying to explain where I *think* Moffat was coming from. I'm not a fan of it (Moffat fails as both a "big picture" writer and a writer with consistent characterization), but they did try to give a reasonable explanation for it.

Re: Major spoilers for "The Angels Take Manhattan"

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this. What he did didn't bother me, just his attitude while he did it.