fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2319 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2319 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[The Slum Cat - Ernest Seton Thompson]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Mass Effect]

__________________________________________________

04.

[The Hunger Games]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Ib]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Family Guy]

__________________________________________________

07.

[The West Wing]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Labyrinth]

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Inspired by above thread.

Is there a kink/fetish/fantasy you wouldn't be able to deal with in an otherwise perfect partner?

Not a kink but: someone who takes sex so seriously that any kind of laughing or talking turns them off or ruins it somehow.

I can't deal with sex if it's serious business.

Agreed, this is like my life philosophy right here

Watersports/scat/infantilization. Just no.

Yeah, that's a line for me.

If I really loved someone, I think I could deal with watersports and adult babies... as an occasional thing though, not as a full blown fetish.

Shit and vomit, though. No. Can't do.

Ditto. I don't think watersports would bother me that much irl, but scat and vomit are dnw, no. Adult babies are a maybe: if it's occasional and absolutely does not involve any diaper changing, I could probably deal w/it on a limited basis.

Yeah, I think I used to be a lot more restrictive when it came to what I'd consider, but I'm realizing that it's not so much what the other person's kinks are, but how they deal with them. I probably wouldn't mind the scat/vomit if they never expected me to partake/deal with it, because it's a level of unsanitary that I can't and won't handle. Watersports aren't unsanitary, just often logistically difficult, depending on the exact kink, and infantalization isn't my bag, but again with both - if I'm not expected to partake/find it sexually appealing, and it's just their thing, I don't see anything wrong with it. I'm not one of those people that gets all weird about my partner reading porn or masturbating.

pretty much

Watersports I'd probably consider (if I was really close to my partner), but anything with shit or vomit is a definite no.

I like to think I'm pretty open minded, but I don't think I'd be comfortable with initialization, either.

I wondered what initialization was then I realized it was probably autocorrect

da

i like to think it's a kink where you want to be initiated to a secret society

so you're gonna need a loving partner who is a good actor and also some very good and understanding friends so they all get in hooded cloaks, get some dark dungeon-type place, some lanterns, and a few days to practice ominous chantings and come up with some hazing acts

Mentioned it in that thread too, but Role Playing is pretty much the only thing I can't do.

~~and as I write this, I realize someone will tell me about some kind of kink I hadn't even thought about~~

Scat, golden showers are the main ones.

It depends. Is this a full blown fetish that they are must engage in, etc. in order to orgasm? Like, if my partner had a scat fetish and there are some activities involving that fetish that must engaged in every time we have sex for him/her to get off... yeah, I don't think I could go for that.

I don't think I could go for the kind of ageplay that involves wearing diapers and pretending to be a baby.

There are other, less common fetishes that I probably wouldn't go for either.

anything involving blood or major amounts of pain for either side. scat is a no too. roleplaying isnt gross like the previous but its a turnoff.

God, so many.

Fursuits, piss/vomit/excrement of any kind, anything that could possibly hurt me seriously (choking, etc. I can deal with some like, spanking I guess, but nothing seriously painful), "daddy" role-playing bullshit, diaper/infantilization. I guess I don't hate it but I couldn't get into wearing ridiculous shit like latex items or whatever, that just seems like too much of a production to get off. Most role-playing would turn me off for the same reason. For me sex is something I can just naturally segway into at any time so having to get dressed up or establish roles or whatever ruins the fun

I'm pretty damn vanilla

Don't think so, though people can always surprise you. If it's a kink they enjoy but can easily go without (or use with someone else on a strictly sexual/kink basis, like going to see a professional Dom/me) for the duration of our relationship if I'm seriously not for it, then pretty much nothing legal and consensual is an automatic dealbreaker even if it deeply weirds me out to know they're into it. But there's a lot of things that no amount of love could make me participate in, and if my partner really needs to in order to be happy with me, then we'll just have to break it off.

I don't know if BDSM counts because anyone into it would be an obviously wrong partner for me, but that is the one thing I would never do. plus vomit I guess?? I had never even thought of that being a fetish until this comment thread. ick.

BDSM isn't just "one thing" -- it's an incredibly diverse range of activities and behaviors. I'm definitely not trying to say that you need to be interested in anything BDSM-related if you don't want to, but it seems odd to talk about it as though it's one single, narrow activity.

I'm aware that the title BDSM applies to many different things, but everything under that umbrella is an absolute no for me, which is why I used it as a blanket term.

Vomit or scat, dominant partners (seeing as I am already pretty dominant myself. I'd be willing to go for a switch every now and then, but someone who is expecting to do 90% of the time? Nope) extreme amounts of pain, dirty talk that is humiliating, i guess you can call it? Like the 'oh you are such a disgusting slut etc etc' stuff. Not my deal, at all.

I can't be with someone who's unwilling to experience new things. I'm really kinky, and I love exploring different sexual acts and kinks/fetishes with my partner. Guys who consider doggy-style "risque" just aren't for me.

I once "dated" this guy who refused to give oral. He said he didn't like it. Receiving it was fine, but it was something he could live without. Giving was a definite no. I broke up with him the day after he told me that.

No point in dating someone you're not sexually compatible with.

[ SECRET POST #2319 ]

Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker

Re: Sexual dealbreaker