[ SECRET POST #257 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #257 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 074 secrets from Secret Submission Post #037.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 2 ] repeats.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Thursday, September 20th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: 16

[bewsbud.livejournal.com]

~I dislike this defense that if your fics aren't getting comments it must be because you suck as a writer.~
I, myself wouldn't agree with anyone who stated that as a fact (which, by the way, I didn't).
Perhaps I need to break my comment down a bit.

I will be the first to agree that there are readers who have no desire to actually give thought to what they read (and as a result a lot of very talented writers get overlooked by a majority of readers).
Many readers want easy.
They want instant gratification.
They don't want to think about what they're reading.
Frankly, if that makes some readers happy, I'm not going to criticize them.
Some people are simply looking for (or need) a bit of brainless escapism (again, I see nothing wrong with that if it makes a reader happy).

The secret poster commented on not receiving the same number of comments as other writers. She must be receiving some comments and at least a small number of readers are reading her "stuff".
My response has nothing to do with the actual size of his/her readership (nor the number of comments from the average reader). It has to do with how vocal his/her readership is (or isn't).
I am in total agreement that some very talented writers, who put a great deal of thought into characterizations, plots and sub-plots, are only appreciated by a small number of readers.
A small, but vocal readership.

I can not begin to tell you how thrilled I am when I run across a writer who actually makes me think.
And I make sure that writer is aware of my appreciation, and I know many other readers who do the same.
We may be a small readership, but readers like us are vocal.
I've had writers tell me they don't mind if the quantity of the feedback is small.
They're happy with a small, appreciative vocal readership.

And I still maintain, some writers do not know the difference between subtle and deep and convoluted and poorly written.

MediaMiner is full of author summaries (and author notes) where the author states their stories are complex, deep, thoughtful.
Some of them are just poorly written...period.
You certainly don't have to take my word on that one.
Just take a look for yourself.