Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-15 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2325 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2325 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 037 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-15 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)And guess what? Yup! They did! Why? Uhhh....I don't know. Can someone tell me why in the hell the Doctor's name is something that should be cared about at all? If there were some specifics about why it was important, I'd be interested, but as of now it could be the Deplorable Word, the question to "42", the answer to "how much wood would a woodchuck chuck", or all three rolled into one, for all it mattered to the story.
So the corniness of that scene might only because especially super-annoying because of how pointless it was.
no subject
I dunno, I'm just hoping it'll turn out to be something cool.
References to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
Part of your comment is amazingly accurate. The rest of it is hilariously off.
Re: References to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
(Anonymous) 2013-05-16 01:40 am (UTC)(link)More references to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
Re: References to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
Re: References to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
(Anonymous) 2013-05-16 05:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: References to spoilers for "The Name of the Doctor"
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-15 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)However, the "Doctor Who" gag has gotten so fucking old. Thank god none of the guest writers since The Bells of St. John have used it. And the "Dr. what?" from Hide was actually funny because it side-stepped the name-drop, almost as if Cross knew how excruciating on-the-nose and pointless the phrase "Doctor Who?" is.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-16 12:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-16 12:54 am (UTC)(link)Also, lol at your implication that nuWho fans are more whiny than oldschool fans. Both have their good contingents, but when you take the rotten section of nuWho fans and the rotten section of oldschool fans, the oldschool ones are far worse about their spluttering and sniveling and stick-up-their-ass-having, by a noticeable, if not exactly sizable, margin.
And I personally rage about the show being *too much* sparkles and pretty, when it's so much better when it allows itself to be a bit dark and painful.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-16 05:15 am (UTC)(link)Dear lord, have you visited Gallifrey Base recently? Or perhaps you are from there and are similarly in a state of perpetual cognitive dissonance and rageyness.
no subject
Doctor Who fandom was basically founded on people complaining.
This isn't limited to nuWho.
no subject
Now I'm sad that I've probably missed some premium 60s and 70s wank. Sigh.