Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-17 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2327 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2327 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
#14 is a moving .gif.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Sofia the First]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Once Upon a Time]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Tara Strong, John de Lancie]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Iron Man 3]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Cristiano Ronaldo]
__________________________________________________
07.

[BriTANick]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Teen Wolf]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Community]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Batman movies (Nolan)]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Nine Inch Nails]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Harry Potter]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Romeo and Juliet, 1968]
__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [SPOILERS for Supernatural]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Star Trek: Into Darkness]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
17. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for suicide]

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
19. [WARNING for non-con]

__________________________________________________
20. [WARNING for dubcon]

__________________________________________________
21. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 12:50 am (UTC)(link)The argument made by the character of Khan decoupled race from biological supremacy, and by making Khan a villain also made the point that biological supremacy isn't necessarily desirable even in its own right, since dividing people into weaker and stronger automatically creates an unfair society even if race isn't a part of it. I mean, it wasn't perfect (still the 1960s here), but it was doing a damn sight better than just having the same old 'eugenic white superman as the villain' plot.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 02:22 am (UTC)(link)Trying to clarify. The problem with the standard 'eugenics is wrong because it produces evil white superhumans' narrative is that it perpetuates the assumption that any quest for genetic superiority will always result in a white guy. It doesn't actually undermine the base narrative of eugenics, that whiteness is genetically superior, it just says that the quest for genetic superiority is morally wrong. It still assumes white is better, it just says that for the good of all we shouldn't pursue the realisation of that superiority.
The character of Khan hit that in two ways. It posited that the quest for genetic superiority might result in a superhuman who wasn't white, thereby knocking the 'superiority is always white' neatly by the wayside, while separately dealing with the 'eugenics is morally wrong and we shouldn't try to divide humans into artificial levels based on genetics'. It separated those two concepts out into different issues, allowing the exploration of both without overtly getting caught up in 'white man's burden' or the legacy of 19th and 20th century racially motivated eugenics.
It really was a massive step forward, as clumsily realised as it was in the research and casting departments.
Re: da
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)I'm a bit paranoid about anonymity (possibly uselessly). Use any name you feel like. :) I hadn't realised it was something worth quoting.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 09:31 am (UTC)(link)