case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-19 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2329 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2329 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #333.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2013-05-20 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
It's not like the fangirls don't have their own brand of shallowness - they pretty much forget the 50-somethings exist when it comes to slash, and when they do write about them it's always a "flashback" to their younger days - but it's not like the dudes even do that. It's not like "gender-swapped so and so as a 19-year-old fresh recruit" it's just straight up "gender-swapped so and so, as they are right now, only 19 for some reason instead of 35".

Bleeeecccccchhhhh.

Oh well, thanks for the link to that Rule 63 site. That one is awesome!
ryttu3k: (Default)

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-05-20 09:59 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh :( What's the fandom, out of curiosity?

You're welcome! There's some really neat stuff there. I really like that the rule 63 dwarves from the Hobbits still have facial hair, since, honestly, they DO...
ariakas: (Default)

[personal profile] ariakas 2013-05-20 10:06 am (UTC)(link)
CoD. Of course, part of this is the Japanese side's obsession with moeshit, I'm sure.

I like that too :3
ryttu3k: (Default)

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-05-20 10:34 am (UTC)(link)
Call of Duty? Or do I have my acronyms wrong?

Yeah, it's something you don't often see in fiction outside of 'lol sideshow freaks'!
ariakas: (man walks on fucking moon)

[personal profile] ariakas 2013-05-20 10:38 am (UTC)(link)
Yep, Call of Duty. No female characters in it, really, so when fanboys want to wank, I suppose, they do teenaged female versions of the cast.

Makes sense, but it blows my mind when fangirls do it. Female soldiers wear the same damn shit male soldiers do, but genderswap suddenly = MINISKIRTS AND HEELS ON THE BATTLEFIELD.

In a way, though, it seems wrong, because those faces are still very feminine, and if I recall correctly, Tolkien said something about outsiders having difficulty telling male and female dwarves apart? Those are very, very obviously female, slight beards or no...
ryttu3k: (Default)

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2013-05-20 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds about right :| And that sounds about as practical as some of the rule 63 of Link. Yup, flimsy, revealing tunics and heels are endlessly practical for hitting monsters with swords!

Ah, true... there is a kind of thing where they lack some of the features that dwarf men have, though. There's resistance to making women look 'ugly'.