[ SECRET POST #2329 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2329 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 083 secrets from Secret Submission Post #333.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

DA

You do realize that the article in question primarily rips off the majority of a thousand word essay by Dana Reinhardt on the Quest For Kindness blog in the exact same way, right? It's pretty hypocritical to rip on someone for posting an 840 word article with a link at the end when said article "includes" a direct "quote" consisting of 719 words of a 1005 word essay that has a link at the end to the original essay. When around 85% of your article is around 71% of someone else's work, what did you create beside the frame? Do you really think someone deserve to be compensated for basically reposting someone else's content?