[ SECRET POST #2330 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2330 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #333.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Attitude towards retcons?

[(Anonymous)]

Ehhhh.... I don't know. I think writers should be aiming to create a good, coherent story in the first place, without having to retroactively change a bunch of stuff.

But, on the other hand, I can see how they can be good. But with remakes and the like, retconning stuff could be used to improve the original story, or write a better one.

(For example: I would really like to see a remake of the terrible sci-fi film "In Time" which starred Justin Timberlake. Mainly because the concepts were interesting - with better actors and a better story, it could have been SO much better.)