[ SECRET POST #2336 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2336 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Transgenderism or whatever.

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I didn't expect them to know how to ask about it without offending anyone? I pointed out that it's problematic (which it is and if OP wants to find out more about it using the internet it might be better for them to find that out sooner rather than later before they get dog piled) and then mentioned a couple of examples that would (hopefully) give OP food for thought and help them understand the underlying issue better?

That's what I was going for, in any case. I think it's commendable that OP tries to learn without upsetting their transgender partner. Back when I was introduced to transgender theory it helped visualizing what I considered to be "man" and "woman" by using a table that listed different characteristics and then asking myself why I considered a person with XYZ to be male when a person with XZ characteristics was, to me, a woman, but YZ was male again. That helped me better understand the sex/gender issue and that was what I was trying to re-do for OP with the second part of my comment.