Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-29 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2339 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2339 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
The question was so passive aggressive, it really deserved that answer.
no subject
no subject
And the worst part is that there's pretty much nothing you can do. It's not like a thread where you can jump in and everyone sees it; you're just sort of stuck shouting into a void. I think I tried once before giving up.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 04:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-29 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I read that when he posted it, and he started the damn answer the same way as he was asked, heck he even answered the person, just not with a new answer (because why should he?)...
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The next day on his journal, he apologized for being so brusque. Bless.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 03:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
wevs though. I also wish folk would do their research, or go through some backlogs, before asking things that have already been answered. Otherwise I get lazy vibes.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 12:36 am (UTC)(link)IT WAS ONLY ONE PARAGRAPH, BUT STILL.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 01:08 am (UTC)(link)I was going to read the article before, but I'm so reading it now because that's crazy!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 03:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 05:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 03:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 04:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 05:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-30 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)