[ SECRET POST #2339 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2339 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #334.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[kallanda_lee]

Sorry if I was a bit harsh in the last post - I just do not understand how you would expect to fully, 100 percent know someone's sexual history at all times....and how you expect this is the norm sexual relationships, or that most people (of either gender) even care? Honestly, I've NEVER met anyone with that expectation in my real life circle.

And that does not imply non-consent. I can give consent regardless of knowing the full details someone's sexual history. If I found out tomorrow that my bf was a virgin when we slept together first (he wasn't, but let's assume here) - how could that ever even affect my consent? I have given consent to a person, not to a collection of sexual experiences.

Look; if someone told me they were healthy, for example, but they knew they had HIV - then hell yes, I'd consider that deception because it can actually affect me, and that information might have influenced consent. It might have influenced the type of sex I'd be willing to have, if at all, and it might have repercussions for my health.

But I do not see how sexual history *in general* even influences consent at all. The people he slept with in college, for example, what do they even have to do with me?

Or do you say this specifically because Odo is an alien, but you wouldn't apply this to a real life situation?

I just honestly don't see it. He's not impersonating someone else. He's not lying to get in bed with her. He's not withholding information that could negatively impact her. I do not see how this fits the definition in any way.

(frozen comment)

[insanenoodlyguy]

Kallanda... don't apologize to the troll.



The male pronouns are appropriate because the troll has probably "raped" and only guys can rape.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

He's not withholding information that could negatively impact her

It's up to her to decide what information will negatively impact her. It's not up to him to say "She doesn't need to know that"

(frozen comment)

[kallanda_lee]

Since people do not generally write diaries about their whole life histories, we generally make decisions about what's important info based on experience. By definition, we will decide for other people what is important to know and what isn't, since we can never tell them everything.