case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-02 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2343 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2343 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[not a repeat, was too big before]


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it makes it not racially driven, which is what the topic at hand is about: racially-driven humor. I already said that, to me, it was still offensive.

And please don't try to deflect. You started this thread not because you were upset people don't find Cumberbatch mockery as offensive, you did it because you were called out for making a racist joke. You then argued that these two types of mockery are the same thing. And now, by acknowledging my point that one is racially-driven and the other isn't, you should concede that they really are not the same.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I was a different anon.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2013-06-02 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
+1