[ SECRET POST #2348 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2348 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Bubble Guppies]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bubble Guppies]


__________________________________________________



04. http://i.imgur.com/eDZ1vzE.jpg
[linked for porn-ish, illustrated]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for A Song of Ice and Fire]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Star Trek Into Darkness]



__________________________________________________























07. [WARNING for rape]

[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest, abuse, possible non-con]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape]
http://i.imgur.com/yVPrzc7.png
[linked for graphic rape in fic text which was, funnily enough, not marked by OP]


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Case:

[chardmonster]

In all fairness you probably shouldn't post stuff like this. Most people encountering "WARNING for pedophilia" probably expect it to be something like "I ship something inappropriate." Not a graphic depiction of child rape.

Re: Case:

[case]

Pretty sure the "linked for graphic fic text" was clear.

Re: Case:

[chardmonster]

I realize, but honestly I expected something more like kissing? I don't have triggers, but this is something that could really, really hurt someone.

Allowing this stuff through, even with a warning, encourages it.

Re: Case:

[case]

I'll make the warning more clear!

Also, to specify further - if it were something like "I ship an underage pairing" it wouldn't be in the "linked for" category where I don't actually post the direct image up. To read it, people have to manually click through and are warned before they do - that's the idea.

Re: Case:

[chardmonster]

Hey, I get it! You're doing a good job. That's just... way worse than usual is all.

Re: Case:

[case]

Nah don't worry, it wasn't for you specifically, just anyone reading this thread that didn't get what the link thing meant.

And yeah, it is worse than usual, I'd agree with that (but most of the linked stuff is, like pictures of RL death/gore). But I mean, all I can really do is say "hey warning graphic details here" - and if people click through a link labeled expecting just a mention of something like "non-con" and get graphic detail (which was warned for) instead, I can't stop them. I get that secrets are usually mild mentions like the former but I don't think the more extreme ones should be banned entirely if adequately warned for.

Re: Case:

[(Anonymous)]

as someone who has clicked links here before and never been triggered prior to this, I can promis you it wasn't enough

Re: Case:

[insanenoodlyguy]

But is that case's fault, or just a mistaken assumption? He did have it linked off with a warning. And he did change it a bit when asked.

Re: Case:

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not saying it's Case's fault. I'm saying the phrasing was not sufficient for what he intended, even after the edit.

Re: Case:

[(Anonymous)]

I agree.