case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-07 06:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #2348 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2348 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Bubble Guppies]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Bubble Guppies]


__________________________________________________



04. http://i.imgur.com/eDZ1vzE.jpg
[linked for porn-ish, illustrated]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for A Song of Ice and Fire]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Star Trek Into Darkness]



__________________________________________________























07. [WARNING for rape]

[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for incest, abuse, possible non-con]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for pedophilia, rape]
http://i.imgur.com/yVPrzc7.png
[linked for graphic rape in fic text which was, funnily enough, not marked by OP]


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #335.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Transcript of the non-triggery bit

(Anonymous) 2013-06-08 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
SA (as posted the transcript):

I think most people would find this...disturbing, if not outright triggering.

And 'could be tagged under dub-con'? This is incredibly non-con. Harry's six in that paragraph.

Re: Transcript of the non-triggery bit

(Anonymous) 2013-06-08 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
but doesn't pedophilia mean by default that it's non-con?

Re: Transcript of the non-triggery bit

(Anonymous) 2013-06-08 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
SA. I'd think so but there are undoubtedly people out there who don't view pedophilia as automatically non-con.

Re: Transcript of the non-triggery bit

(Anonymous) 2013-06-09 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, technically pedophilia by default is non-con, since depending on the laws in the area a child is not old enough to consent. However, the term "non-con" tends to be associated with fic where the victim is actively being manipulated, hurt, used, and controlled against their will, which is severely different from the child being happy, loved, and legitimately wanting it despite not being old enough to legally consent, which in context could be considered more of a dub-con.