case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-22 03:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #2363 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2363 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-06-22 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Totally with you there. If it has romantic pairings in it it's not gen!

(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
+1 this used to drive me up the wall with Sherlock fic

(Anonymous) 2013-06-23 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
I've always thought it's gen when a romantic pairing is not the focus of the story? Seems kind of silly to go up the wall about a barely there mention of a couple (if there's some reason for the mention to be there).