[ SECRET POST #2363 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2363 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kaijinscendre]

Because some people don't like fanon pairings. I don't like something like....Dean/Lisa. If I was reading a fic, and they mentioned it, it may put me off reading it.

Well, me personally would question why the hell you are mentioning it. Then I would have to scroll through to make sure they are not going to be showing up in the story. Generally, if you mention something like that in a story, it means they are going to be brought back up (like a boring version of Chekov's Gun).

[(Anonymous)]

And some people don't like canon pairings. Why does that make a difference?

[kaijinscendre]

Because unless you are reading it for a certain fanon pairing, canon pairings are hard to avoid. If Bob and Alice are married in the show, why would they not be married in the fic? Even if the focus is on John, you assume that Alice and Bob are living together. Otherwise, it is an AU story.

[(Anonymous)]

But if an offhand mention of a pairing is a problem (which I don't think it is or at least should be) for people who don't like that pairing, then that is equally true for people who don't like a canon pairing. It is a bit of a double standard that puts canon pairings on a higher level. All fanfic by definition is AU, and generally things that actually get labelled AU aren't labelled that way just because of different pairings.

[kaijinscendre]

I have no idea what you are on about. Do you NOT want people to mark things with Gen if they have any mention? Or do you>

[(Anonymous)]

For me, the line is if there are romantic scenes. Offhand mentions, no matter the pairing, don't make a fic not gen. The instant there are scenes of them being couply, then it is not gen even if the pairing is canon.

[kaijinscendre]

I agree.

[aubry]

What kaijinscendre said, but also because canon pairings are, well - canon. A background mention of a canon ship can be scene-setting. We all already know that that relationship is a fact of the universe we're sharing.

Non-canon pairings (or, say, a canon-pairing but in a fic set at a time when they're not together in canon) is different. It's asking the reader to suspend disbelief and accept as true something that's not part of the shared canon. Some people who don't ship that ship aren't going to want to do that. For those who ship x/z or y/w it'd be annoying on a shipper level. For those looking for gen it's annoying because your ship wasn't what they signed on for.

Not saying that's the only way of defining gen, but it is a difference between canon and non-canon as experienced by a lot of people.

[(Anonymous)]

My feeling is that all fic requires that sort of suspension of disbelief, as even the most faithful of fics is still not canon.

[aubry]

I'd argue that shipping is a special case. Shipping is by far the most politicised axis of fanfic, right? I mean, almost all of our archiving is built around it. A lot of fannish migration happens because of similar ship dynamics. Ship wars are more frequent and usually more brutal than any other differences of interpretation. In theory it should be just like any other mutable element of fandom, in practice you'll bother more people with shipping than with even the most egregious of changes to setting or backstory.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, but all that equally applies to canon pairings. Canon pairings are just as polarizing.

[(Anonymous)]

na

I overall completely agree with you, but Dean/Lisa is canon and so doesn't count for your argument. :D

If it were, say, Sam/Lisa or Dean/Gabriel being randomly mentioned then yeah, I fully am with you.

[kaijinscendre]

Those were the first two names to pop into my head. I didn't realize until afterwards that they were canon. :P