[ SECRET POST #2363 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2363 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 118 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[otakugal15]

I don't see it that way. And I'm one of those who don't get why the fanon pairs are labeled that way, but not the canon pairs.

Just because they're paired doesn't mean it's romantic, even if they ARE in a relationship. Hell, if you make mention that character A is paired with character B, but B isn't featured at all, but said character A is still doing domestic stuff, is that considered romantic as well? No.

I have a different definition. And if fandom doesn't like it, they can go sit in their little cliquey corner and stew for all I care. Cause I don't agree. And others don't as well.