case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-06-28 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #2369 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2369 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Mother India, Sholay]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mad Men]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Hannibal, Red Dragon]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Regular Show]


__________________________________________________



06.
[tomofromearth]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Charles Dance and Emilia Fox in "Rebecca"]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Mandy Patinkin]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Mad Men]

__________________________________________________



10.
[The Creeps]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Star Trek]


__________________________________________________













[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]











12. [SPOILERS for the last of us]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Bioshock Infinite]



__________________________________________________













[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]













14. [WARNING for incest]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



16. >[WARNING for rape]
http://i.imgur.com/eJbMOhY.png
[linked for actual movie scene maybe?]


__________________________________________________



17. [WARNING for non-con]



__________________________________________________



18. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



19. [WARNING for incest, underage]



__________________________________________________



20. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #337.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-06-29 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
Again, very little substance here. You've just repeated it with emphasis.

I don't find it compelling that any group can have 'ownership' of a word and claim full control over whether it's offensive or not (because come on, it's fairly self evident how ridiculous this track will get if we follow it to any sort of logical conclusion), or that hiding behind cutesy phrases such as the 'n word' does anything to meaningfully reduce the harm of the term.

As has been said, words aren't fucking magic, they have the power you imbue them, and from the context in which they're being used.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] mekkio 2013-06-29 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Using that logic, I take it that you've never been hurt by someone's words? Because the way you talk, you should have been able to shake anything off that has been thrown at you.
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-06-29 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
When it's not been aimed specifically at me or my 'group', and without specific malice?

I may find it problematic, and be open to discussion about it, hell it might even bug me a little, but I appreciate that I don't get to shut down the conversation and claim sole ownership, no.
republicanism: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] republicanism 2013-06-29 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
words aren't fucking magic, they have the power you imbue them, and from the context in which they're being used.

well, yeah. that's part of my argument, too.

people 'reclaim' slurs to turn something with a negative history into a means of fostering group identity. this doesn't work for people who are outside of that social group because part of the word's negative context comes from who is saying it. the reason they have 'ownership' over this word is because it was originally attached to them to demean them. reclamation is like a 'fuck you.'

words DO have power you imbue them, but the argument against using slurs is that they are already imbued with power. there are some patent laws in the US that talk about this, but that might stray into the territory of Incredibly Boring, so.

as for "cutesy phrases" like the n word..... i can think of VERY few, if any, contexts where it would be absolutely necessary for a white person to say the actual word. it's something black people have heard right before being victims of hate crimes. obviously the people who have been targeted with it get to decide that it is offensive. that's just how it works. i really don't have any personal investment in using it, so why should i?
ill_omened: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] ill_omened 2013-06-29 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
But in exclusion words don't have any affect.

No gay man ever got hurt just because someone said faggot.

They got hurt because of the ideas behind the word, and the actions those drove.

By making the terms taboo you only help this, and dancing around the specific words just empowers them as a tool. It makes them more dangerous, and it fools no-one because by virtue of what you're doing we know exactly what you're saying.
republicanism: (Default)

Re: ALSO:

[personal profile] republicanism 2013-06-29 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
By making the terms taboo you only help this

....how? you never explained this. they were part of hate speech before they were made taboo. they were threats before they were taboo. that is why they are taboo. they're not 'more dangerous' because of it, they're just a greater indicator of when someone is racist/homophobic/sexist/transphobic etc because those are the type of people that don't respect the fact that there are some things you just shouldn't say.

They got hurt because of the ideas behind the word, and the actions those drove.

yes. EXACTLY. the ideas behind the word. there are ideas behind the word that can drive negative actions. if i'm walking around at night and someone yells a slur specific to my demographic i assume either me or someone around me is about to get the shit kicked out of them. i don't stop and wonder whether or not there was any specific malice behind it because how the fuck should i know? it's a hateful word. the ASSUMPTION that i will make is that there is malice behind it. if you don't want people in that particular social group around you to feel threatened, don't use the word. it's basic respect.

and i'm sorry but i find it really hard to believe that you'd stick to this argument irl. you don't find it offensive when people bandy slurs around as long as there's no ill intent, which you just... know for some reason? i'm gay and i don't get to have a problem with straight women calling themselves 'fag hags' or tell them to stop?

if words never hurt anybody in exclusion...... nothing wrong with westboro baptist church saying 'god hates fags' either, it's just 3 words! i mean no shit words don't actually physically hurt anyone, but if that's your standard then threats and hate speech should also be a-okay.