Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-06-30 03:20 pm
[ SECRET POST #2371 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2371 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 087 secrets from Secret Submission Post #339.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
By the way though, Obama likes Spider-Man comics. So there's your fandom. Congrats.*
I still can't bring myself to care though.
*(Also wasn't there that lady running for office where her competitor tried to use the fact that she played WoW against her? Something about how she's a rogue and she backstabs or something. It was fucking ridiculous.)
no subject
no subject
The only time I could ever see it being used against someone successfully is if it was a legitimate thing that the person had trouble not doing. As in, they can't even stop the activity to do basic things. But I would have that problem no matter the object or whatever the person was addicted to. On top of that, I doubt someone who had such a problem would run for office in the first place.
Either way, it all boils down to that fact I will never ever care what hobbies a person in politics has because that's not what they're in office for. (Unless their hobby is eating babies or something but until that happens I am going to continue to make the blanket statement that I don't care.)
no subject
I totally agree with you about not caring what hobbies a politician has...I agree with OP to an extent, but I perhaps don't think it's quite as big of a deal. I'd love for fandom to be more accepted because those hobbies shouldn't reflect poorly on people, but at the same time, for myself I don't caaaare because I like what I like regardless. If I ran for office, yeah it would piss me off. If we keep having incidents like WoW Lady, and people can't quit shitting themselves over it...then I'll be sad and probably more invested in it as an issue.
no subject
In all honesty I doubt it will keep happening because it proved to be such a failure for him. People aren't going to keep using something in a smear campaign if it doesn't get them votes. Hopefully. I want to have a little faith that they aren't that stupid.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
There you go
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-30 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Even though people joke about things like this, I think it would mean a lot to have a president or government official be openly into fandom. It's already accepted to be sports fans, why can't people be honest about having their life changed by a cartoon or video game?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-30 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-30 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)What, specifically, are you still waiting for?
this!
(Anonymous) 2013-07-01 03:45 am (UTC)(link)(it's still weird that he's younger than me)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-06-30 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
A Trekkie? Sure. My congressman is one, had a whole themed interview on Colbert. Buffy? Hell, most TV fandoms besides Supernatural? No worries. I'd love a powerful politician who admits to playing video games.
But Sonic? No. That fandom is Lyndon LaRouche crazy.
no subject
no subject
I mean I'd understand why they did it, but that wouldn't make me feel any better about it.
*Completely fictional example, I don't think anyone's actually done this.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-01 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-01 12:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Voter: "Hey, they like 1984! I love that book!"
Candidate: "It's one of my favorites. I love a happy ending."
But it's not like people haven't voted based on irrelevant things in the past.
no subject
no subject
*Maybe* you get a little bit of the aggression channeling and distraction from video games but when you compare benefits, you've got all of the above versus "my sad-sack, anti-social self felt better."
And let's be real, feeling better is a good thing, but if my grown man/woman government representative starting waxing poetic about how a cartoon CHANGED THEIR LIFE, I'm 95 percent certain I'd think they were a fucking moron who never got over the mean people they knew as a kid. And depending on how good of a legislator they were, I'd probably hope they got booted from office in the next election, because seriously.