[ SECRET POST #2380 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2380 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #340.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The Equal Rights Amendment

[intrigueing]

Those are very good points and it's a perfectly valid argument, but IMO (and in a lot of other people's opinion), it just doesn't work that way IRL. Without the Equal Rights Act spelling things out clearly, there are too many loopholes through which people can argue that sure, we're t o t a l l y being treated equally to men when we actually aren't, because doing xyz totally unfair gender discriminatory thing that screws over women can be argued to not fall under the protections given outside of the Equal Rights Act.

Tl;dr, yes, I understand and agree with Ainsley's sentiment when she says "I am not a special subset in need of your protection" and "The same Article 14 that protects you, protects me." Because that is how it is in theory, and that's how it should be.

But actually, in practice, we are, and it doesn't.