case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-07-09 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2380 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2380 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #340.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: The classic ERA just isn't enough anymore.

(Anonymous) 2013-07-10 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
"Sex, sexual preference, or gender identity".

That said, though - I mean, it would be a great constitutional amendment and I would vote for it a million times over if I could. But it is about as politically plausible as a constitutional amendment declaring the abolition of private property and the liquidation of the capitalist class. An Equal Rights Amendment could be possible (although deeply unlikely at this point - I think it seemed somewhat more likely when Sorkin was writing that, although even then I think it was something of the past) but a real Equal Rights Amendment... I don't think so.

I'm not sure what it says about the country that it's so, or what we can do to change that. It's a bit grim.