Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2013-07-14 03:40 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2013-07-14 03:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #2385 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2385 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-07-14 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)But yeah, the characters are definitely not getting more grounded in their characterization -- they're getting far more variable. Mind you, this isn't a COMPLETELY bad thing, since it allows more room for experimentation and alternative interpretations and creativity, which is great for standalone stories, but it does diminish continuity considerably, which isn't great for crisis crossovers and the like because it makes the characters seem OOC when comparing actions they took in 1995 versus 2005, and then people argue over which actions were OOC and which were IC.
no subject
That seems to really complicate things. Thank you for the clarification. I guess I'd be on the side for more consistency and leaving the alternate interpretation to stand-alones or something. Kind of best of both world but yeah, huh.
Thank you.