Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2013-07-16 06:53 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2013-07-16 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2387 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2387 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: LOL at all the writing critics ITT
(Anonymous) 2013-07-17 02:06 am (UTC)(link)My issue isn't so much with the paleontology gaffes (it was written what, 25 years ago? We've learned a few things) but more with Crichton's overhyped, formulaic, almost preachy writing. He has some good ideas ("just because you have the power to do something doesn't mean you should") but IMO can't write a gripping, read-over-and-over-again story.
On the other hand, if someone who hadn't bothered to actually practice their own profession started mischaracterizing and sensationalizing mine, I'd be pissed too.