[ SECRET POST #2387 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2387 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #341.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

As a kid I sat down and read all of Dragon Ball, at the insistence of people that my critique of it was not based on actual knowledge of the thing. I did not learn anything after volume 2 that changed my opinion, but I did waste hours of my life.

Likewise, nobody needs to have read the whole of Twilight or 50 Shades of Grey if their critique is levelled only at the themes of these books, because knowledge of those themes can be acquired second hand. Nobody needs to have read the whole of it to critique the writing style, because excerpts are readily available.

Yes, if someone were writing a review for, say, a paper or a review site, rather than merely discussing their own personal opinion, research should probably involve at least reading more of the high-lighted problem areas, if not the whole thing (depending on the seriousness of where the review is published).

For casual discourse, second hand information is plenty good enough.