[ SECRET POST #2392 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2392 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment) Re: Trigger warning for eating disorders

[(Anonymous)]

No, but it'd be hard to say you weren't responsible for your death if it happened.

Just because you did it the first time at eleven doesn't magically mean you'd never be responsible again.

(frozen comment) Re: Trigger warning for eating disorders

[(Anonymous)]

That really depends.

Generally, under the law, most 11-year old would NOT be considered responsible for their actions. Because the law, rightfully so, considers an 11-year-old decision-making ability to be impaired compared to an adult's.

But say you still consider elephantinegrace responsible in the broad sense of the world, would you still say that she (I think she?) is unworthy of sympathy because of it? Because that's basically what op's saying.