[ SECRET POST #2392 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2392 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



12.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #342.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Reviewing fic with annoying author's note?

[(Anonymous)]

usually passive-aggressive lines like that are super obviously passive-aggressive, and therefore sound more jerkish then a simple "btw your author's note was offputting." and if it does sound completely sincere, the author is probably not going to put 2+2 together and quit doing it.

Re: Reviewing fic with annoying author's note?

[(Anonymous)]

it's a win-win anyway

they get it: what can the writer do? if they call op on being passive-aggressive, op can deny it since they technically said only good things. the hypocrisy would be delicious, since the writer started the passive-aggressive game, so op has a good laugh and then moves on

they don't get it: op has a good laugh and then moves on

Re: Reviewing fic with annoying author's note?

[(Anonymous)]

Easy answer? Be PA back - it's actually not that hard if you're used to it.